Firm Wins TRO Against ICE

Four days after we and our co-counsel, the ACLU, NYCLU and Make the Road New York, filed a lawsuit challenging  inhumane and unconstitutional conditions at ICE’s 26 Federal Plaza detention facility, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, ordered the government to immediately provide confidential attorney access to detained individuals, severely limit the permitted population of the rooms at the facility, provide basic necessities such as sleeping mats and hygiene products, and to otherwise remedy unsanitary conditions at 26 Fed.

The New York Times

Systemic Challenge to Unlawful ICE Detentions at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Wang Hecker LLP, with co-counsel the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, and Make the Road New York, filed a lawsuit on behalf of an individual detained at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan (“26 Fed”) and a proposed class of thousands of individuals detained there for days without beds to sleep on, adequate meals, the ability to bathe, or access to counsel.  The lawsuit asserts a constitutional challenge to the horrific and unlawful conditions in which ICE is detaining individuals at 26 Fed and seeks an emergency temporary restraining order to prohibit the government from continuing these practices.

The New York Times

Survivors Secure Landmark Settlement Against NYPD

On behalf of Plaintiffs Jennifer Welch Demski and Alison Turkos, Wang Hecker LLP obtained extensive injunctive relief and $1.025 million against the City of New York and the NYPD. The lawsuit asserted sex discrimination claims under the NYC Human Rights Law for the discriminatory provision of investigative services by the Special Victims Division (“SVD”) to victims of sexual assault, who are 90% female.  The settlement imposes significant requirements on the SVD, including by instituting specific service and training requirements as well as caseload limits for SVD investigators, ensuring a permanent staff member oversee training of all SVD investigators, and continuing bi-annual substantive review of sample cases by survivor advocates.  You can read press coverage about the settlement here and here.

The New York Times

Retaliatory Lawsuit Dismissed with Sanctions Imposed

The firm successfully achieved the dismissal of a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Sean Combs’ former security guard Joseph Sherman against our client – whose underlying lawsuit against Combs and Sherman for sexually assaulting her years earlier is ongoing – and against our co-counsel in that case, Gloria Allred. The judge called Sherman’s claims “patently frivolous” and imposed sanctions on Sherman’s lawyer for having filed the case.

You can read the decision here.

$25M Judgment for Child Sex Abuse Victim Upheld in Landmark Bankruptcy Ruling

We recently obtained a $25 million judgment on behalf of a woman who was sexually abused by her brother decades earlier under New York’s Child Victim’s Act. Subsequently, in defending against the defendant’s efforts to nullify the judgment in bankruptcy court, the firm achieved a landmark victory when the Bankruptcy Court held that the “domestic violence” exception to the bankruptcy stay applied to sexual violence that occurred years earlier. 

Defending the American Association of University Professors Against “SLAPP” Suit Brought to Punish Protected Speech

Wang Hecker LLP, with co-counsel the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, represents the Columbia University chapter of the American Association of University Professors (“Columbia-AAUP”), who are defendants in the lawsuit Doe v. Alwan. During student protests at Columbia in April 2024, Columbia-AAUP made statements supporting the right of students to protest and criticizing the university’s punitive response to the protests. Two months later, five current and former Columbia students sued Columbia-AAUP for making those and similar statements.  Wang Hecker LLP and the ACLU filed a motion to dismiss under New York’s “anti-SLAPP” statute, arguing that the case is a “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation,” or “SLAPP,” that weaponizes our legal system and seeks to punish protected speech by making meritless legal claims. More information about the case is available in this blog post.